How to be correct in an argument — 2

Argumentum ad Hominem

is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument.

Empirical adequacy

if all of what it says about observable aspects of the world (past, present, and future) is true.

Argument should be empirically adequate, i.e. it should hold for things we observe.

Logical Consistency

no contradiction to what they are saying. If P is true, then they should not say that ~P is also true.

Circular reasoning

Logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with

You can contact the author at me@abhinavrai.com